Colo. shop’s review experiences offer lessons for new onlin…
Nylund’s Collision Center’s manager remembered a “great” interaction with a pleasant State Farm catastrophic adjuster, according to shop owner Robert Grieve.
“The guy paid for everything,” Grieve said Thursday. There were no issues, no turbulence at all.
But the next day, Aug. 30, a Google review from the adjuster appeared blasting the shop, Grieve said.
“NOT recommended,” poster David Hudson wrote on Google. “They ask for repairs that they dont need, and try to pass the rediculous costs onto the insurance companies. Before using them, know they have a long list for all to see at the front door regarding field adjusters NOT allowed on their premises! What kind of place does that?”
“We are extremely guest-centric here,” Grieve said. The appearance of a review triggers alerts to all of the relevant personnel, he said.
The 1-star attack without any seeming provocation came as a surprise.
“He cost me a tenth of a point,” Grieve said. Nylund’s rating fell from a 4.8 out of 5 to a 4.7.
Grieve replied to the review on Google, challenging the adjuster’s attack.
“For those reading this review. please understand it is from an Insurance Adjuster,” he wrote.
“It’s unfortunate that some adjusters in the insurance industry have taken to public criticism of those who won’t bow down to their aggressive and misleading tactics. It is true we have a list of adjusters not welcome on the premises. It is there because they have no interest in repairing the vehicle correctly or matting our guests whole. They are there for one reason only and that is to minimize the repair at all costs at the expense of our guest. We gladly provide them with the manufacturer recommended repair procedures which is the basis for our repair methodology. Many adjusters are not accustom to this as so many shops do not even look up how the manufacturer wants repairs preformed on the vehicle. Our guests and their safety is and always has been our number one concern.”
Grieve said many in the industry “gave huge support,” and he thought that some of those people reported it to Google. He said he didn’t attempt to flag the post to the search engine giant himself, feeling a complaint about a negative review by the reviewed business “doesn’t have the same clout” and might just be viewed as sour grapes by Google.
“It’s clearly against their guidelines,” Grieve said, arguing that a reviewer must “have done business” at the company he or she is reviewing. Google isn’t as clear-cut as Yelp about who shouldn’t be reviewing a business, but it does at one point note, “Your reviewers are already customers.”
Get advice for marketing your shop at Repairer Driven Education
Grieve said the adjuster was a member of State Farm’s catastrophic team, and while he thought Hudson was a full-time employee rather than an outside contractor, he wasn’t positive. We attempted to find Hudson on LinkedIn but were unsuccessful.
Grieve said he did raise the issue with a local State Farm representative, who was “very concerned” and reported it to Hudson’s supervisors. “Kudos to him,” Grieve said.
Grieve doesn’t know if the review’s disappearance — which occurred nearly a week after Grieve first contacted State Farm — was Google’s doing, the result of State Farm compelling Hudson or if Hudson “compelled himself.”
Attempts to find contact information for Hudson, who remains a Google Local Guide, were unsuccessful.
“State Farm has nothing to share with RDN,” State Farm Colorado spokesman Benjamin Palmer wrote in an email Friday.
An email to a Colorado State Farm spokesman has not yet been returned.
Grieve said he was blown away by the industry support, which he said included new positive reviews and flagging Hudson’s critique on Google.
“I’m grateful for everybody’s support,” he said.
Google, Yelp and Facebook all have policies for reporting questionable reviews and definitions of what’s questionable.
“Yelp works hard to be a trusted resource for consumers, so reviews should be written by someone with an unbiased consumer interest,” Yelp writes. “This means we’ll remove a review if it’s clear that it was posted by someone with a conflict of interest, including reviews from current or former employees, competitors or peers, or friends and family members of the business owner – even if they insist they were actually a customer and were uninfluenced by their relation to the business.”
Google is a little more vague, writing, “Maps user contributed content is most valuable when it is honest and unbiased.” It gives three examples of “disallowed practices”: “Reviewing your own business,” “Posting content about a current or former employment experience” and “Posting content about a competitor to manipulate their ratings.” However, Google notes these aren’t the only things it’d take down.
“Your content should reflect your genuine experience at the location and should not be posted just to manipulate a place’s ratings,” Google also writes.
He said he doesn’t specify the customer use a particular platform, reasoning that everyone has their own favorite site to post reviews. The shop’s review library grew organically on various sites like Google, Yelp and Facebook, according to Grieve.
“Yelp’s recommendation software is designed to highlight reviews from people inspired to share their experiences with the community,” Yelp wrote. “Most businesses only target happy customers when asking for reviews which leads to biased ratings, so the recommendation software actively tries to identify and not recommend reviews prompted or encouraged by the business. The Business Owner Guidelines section of our Content Guidelines, which are part of our Terms of Service, also makes clear that businesses should not ask for Yelp reviews.”